Rank | Team | W-L | FEI |
1 | Florida | 10-1 | 0.323 |
2 | Penn State | 10-1 | 0.282 |
3 | Oklahoma | 10-1 | 0.277 |
4 | USC | 10-1 | 0.271 |
5 | Texas | 11-1 | 0.269 |
6 | North Carolina | 7-4 | 0.250 |
7 | Georgia Tech | 7-3 | 0.234 |
8 | Alabama | 12-0 | 0.229 |
9 | Boston College | 8-3 | 0.213 |
10 | Florida State | 6-4 | 0.200 |
11 | Ohio State | 9-2 | 0.188 |
12 | Texas Tech | 9-1 | 0.186 |
13 | Virginia Tech | 7-4 | 0.179 |
14 | Pittsburgh | 8-3 | 0.176 |
15 | Clemson | 5-5 | 0.175 |
16 | Mississippi | 7-4 | 0.174 |
17 | Iowa | 7-4 | 0.171 |
18 | Ball State | 11-0 | 0.171 |
19 | Cincinnati | 9-2 | 0.161 |
20 | Wake Forest | 7-5 | 0.160 |
21 | Missouri | 8-3 | 0.140 |
22 | Connecticut | 6-4 | 0.139 |
23 | Boise State | 11-0 | 0.133 |
24 | Utah | 11-0 | 0.131 |
25 | West Virginia | 6-4 | 0.129 |
26 | Rutgers | 5-5 | 0.125 |
27 | TCU | 9-2 | 0.124 |
28 | Georgia | 8-3 | 0.119 |
29 | North Carolina State | 5-6 | 0.114 |
30 | Miami | 6-5 | 0.110 |
31 | South Florida | 6-4 | 0.103 |
32 | Oklahoma State | 8-3 | 0.097 |
33 | Navy | 6-4 | 0.089 |
34 | Oregon | 9-3 | 0.082 |
35 | California | 7-4 | 0.078 |
36 | South Carolina | 6-5 | 0.078 |
37 | East Carolina | 8-4 | 0.078 |
38 | Michigan State | 9-3 | 0.077 |
39 | Virginia | 4-7 | 0.076 |
40 | Maryland | 6-5 | 0.067 |
41 | Oregon State | 8-4 | 0.062 |
42 | Arizona | 6-5 | 0.059 |
43 | Northwestern | 8-3 | 0.059 |
44 | Wisconsin | 6-5 | 0.054 |
45 | Bowling Green | 6-6 | 0.045 |
46 | Notre Dame | 6-6 | 0.044 |
47 | Southern Mississippi | 6-6 | 0.042 |
48 | Duke | 3-8 | 0.037 |
49 | Illinois | 4-7 | 0.036 |
50 | Tulsa | 9-2 | 0.034 |
51 | Vanderbilt | 6-6 | 0.026 |
52 | Buffalo | 7-5 | 0.023 |
53 | Northern Illinois | 5-6 | 0.021 |
54 | Houston | 6-5 | 0.021 |
55 | LSU | 6-5 | 0.021 |
56 | Western Michigan | 8-3 | 0.017 |
57 | BYU | 9-2 | 0.015 |
58 | Auburn | 4-7 | 0.013 |
59 | Central Michigan | 7-4 | 0.008 |
60 | Tennessee | 5-7 | 0.002 |
61 | Temple | 5-7 | 0.000 |
62 | Nebraska | 8-4 | -0.007 |
63 | Louisville | 4-6 | -0.008 |
64 | Purdue | 3-8 | -0.010 |
65 | Minnesota | 6-5 | -0.012 |
66 | Kansas | 6-5 | -0.019 |
67 | Michigan | 3-9 | -0.019 |
68 | Rice | 9-3 | -0.020 |
69 | Memphis | 5-6 | -0.025 |
70 | Stanford | 5-7 | -0.026 |
71 | Akron | 5-7 | -0.031 |
72 | Arizona State | 4-6 | -0.034 |
73 | Air Force | 7-4 | -0.036 |
74 | Marshall | 3-8 | -0.037 |
75 | Kentucky | 5-6 | -0.044 |
76 | Baylor | 3-8 | -0.046 |
77 | Ohio | 3-8 | -0.049 |
78 | Central Florida | 3-8 | -0.051 |
79 | Troy | 6-4 | -0.059 |
80 | UTEP | 5-7 | -0.070 |
81 | Arkansas | 4-7 | -0.076 |
82 | Nevada | 6-5 | -0.078 |
83 | Fresno State | 7-5 | -0.089 |
84 | Syracuse | 2-9 | -0.091 |
85 | New Mexico | 4-8 | -0.096 |
86 | Kent State | 3-8 | -0.097 |
87 | Colorado | 4-7 | -0.104 |
88 | Arkansas State | 5-5 | -0.108 |
89 | Colorado State | 5-6 | -0.112 |
90 | Middle Tennessee | 5-6 | -0.115 |
91 | Mississippi State | 3-8 | -0.115 |
92 | Kansas State | 4-7 | -0.117 |
93 | UCLA | 4-7 | -0.122 |
94 | Eastern Michigan | 2-9 | -0.126 |
95 | Army | 3-7 | -0.131 |
96 | UNLV | 5-7 | -0.133 |
97 | UAB | 3-8 | -0.137 |
98 | Louisiana Lafayette | 5-6 | -0.141 |
99 | Toledo | 3-9 | -0.141 |
100 | Miami (OH) | 1-10 | -0.144 |
101 | Indiana | 2-9 | -0.150 |
102 | Florida Atlantic | 6-6 | -0.153 |
103 | Iowa State | 1-10 | -0.157 |
104 | San Jose State | 5-6 | -0.166 |
105 | Louisiana Monroe | 3-8 | -0.167 |
106 | SMU | 0-11 | -0.172 |
107 | Louisiana Tech | 6-5 | -0.172 |
108 | Wyoming | 3-8 | -0.176 |
109 | Hawaii | 6-5 | -0.180 |
110 | Western Kentucky | 0-9 | -0.181 |
111 | Texas A&M | 4-8 | -0.184 |
112 | Florida International | 4-7 | -0.186 |
113 | Utah State | 3-9 | -0.189 |
114 | Tulane | 2-10 | -0.216 |
115 | New Mexico State | 2-9 | -0.232 |
116 | San Diego State | 2-9 | -0.240 |
117 | Washington | 0-11 | -0.241 |
118 | Washington State | 1-11 | -0.309 |
119 | Idaho | 1-10 | -0.316 |
120 | North Texas | 1-11 | -0.349 |
Wednesday, December 03, 2008
Week 14 FEI Ratings
Through games of November 29th. Only FBS games are considered. Click here for expanded FEI Ratings data, including weekly rankings, expanded records, offensive/defensive efficiency, and special teams and field position efficiency.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Your system seems to be higher on the ACC than other systems/polls. I would be very interested in reading a breakdown of why that is. I don't mean that in a "I think your system is wrong, why don't you explain yourself" kind of way. I'm very curious about what is going on that causes this. What is everyone else not seeing?
Go to Footballoutsiders.com and check out his last few columns. He covers the issue pretty well.
Okay, thanks. That pretty much covered what I was interested it.
Post a Comment